L'élection de Hocevar qualifiée de "suicide pour Debian"!
Le
Yugo
Chacun a ses raisons de qualifier l'élection de Hocevar de
catastrophe. Voici celle de Radu-Cristian Fotescu dans une entrée de
blog intitulée "The Debian kindergarten".
«It can be understood that the majority of Debian developers were not
happy with the decision to have someone be paid for a work the rest
of them are doing for free and for fun. There is nevertheless a long
way from disgruntling to the kindergarten-like mutiny that was the
Dunc-Bank, «an experiment to see how aggressive bug reporting can
delay the release of Debian Etch. We hope that by finding more and
more RC bugs in Debian we can delay Etch.»
«If this is not deliberate sabotage by your books, we're definitely
playing different games.
«The Dunc-Bank sabotage was initiated by Sam Hocevar, a well-known
Debian developer. Then, Sam Hocevar was elected as the new DPL for
2007! It's useless to ask "how many voted for Sam", because the
Debian elections are using an advanced Condorcet voting system with
Schwartz Sequential Dropping, to guarantee that the winner is the
candidate that is the less hated, if I am allowed to put it this way.
That means Sam was the best choice for Debian, as expressed by the
voice of the Debian developers. In my opinion, Sam is the worst thing
that could happen to Debian, and a clear sign that Debian is going
nowhere.
«This is suicide for Debian. Mere suicide. As Sam was elected by the
Debian developers, Vox Populi, Vox Dei.
Debian will continue to be largely unaffected by this decision, but
electing the main saboteur as your leader is ruining the last attempt
to trust the Debian Project.»
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/c.../122/1/17/
Bien évidemment. Hocevar s'est empressé d'ajouter en entête de la page
de Dunc Bank que ce n'était là qu'une blague qui n'a duré que deux
jours. Les entrées sur la page semblent pourtany indiquer le
contraire, mais passons. Je laisse ses mignons -- le terme est de lui
-- douter ici du manque du sens de l'humour de Fotescu.
Toujours est-il que, quant à moi, mon opinion n'a pas changé. Debian
avait aussi besoin de Hocevar comme project leader que d'un tas de
merde dans sa cour.
catastrophe. Voici celle de Radu-Cristian Fotescu dans une entrée de
blog intitulée "The Debian kindergarten".
«It can be understood that the majority of Debian developers were not
happy with the decision to have someone be paid for a work the rest
of them are doing for free and for fun. There is nevertheless a long
way from disgruntling to the kindergarten-like mutiny that was the
Dunc-Bank, «an experiment to see how aggressive bug reporting can
delay the release of Debian Etch. We hope that by finding more and
more RC bugs in Debian we can delay Etch.»
«If this is not deliberate sabotage by your books, we're definitely
playing different games.
«The Dunc-Bank sabotage was initiated by Sam Hocevar, a well-known
Debian developer. Then, Sam Hocevar was elected as the new DPL for
2007! It's useless to ask "how many voted for Sam", because the
Debian elections are using an advanced Condorcet voting system with
Schwartz Sequential Dropping, to guarantee that the winner is the
candidate that is the less hated, if I am allowed to put it this way.
That means Sam was the best choice for Debian, as expressed by the
voice of the Debian developers. In my opinion, Sam is the worst thing
that could happen to Debian, and a clear sign that Debian is going
nowhere.
«This is suicide for Debian. Mere suicide. As Sam was elected by the
Debian developers, Vox Populi, Vox Dei.
Debian will continue to be largely unaffected by this decision, but
electing the main saboteur as your leader is ruining the last attempt
to trust the Debian Project.»
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/c.../122/1/17/
Bien évidemment. Hocevar s'est empressé d'ajouter en entête de la page
de Dunc Bank que ce n'était là qu'une blague qui n'a duré que deux
jours. Les entrées sur la page semblent pourtany indiquer le
contraire, mais passons. Je laisse ses mignons -- le terme est de lui
-- douter ici du manque du sens de l'humour de Fotescu.
Toujours est-il que, quant à moi, mon opinion n'a pas changé. Debian
avait aussi besoin de Hocevar comme project leader que d'un tas de
merde dans sa cour.
Poser une question
Ah parceque c'est rémunéré? Eh beh...
Monsieur Yugo, vous faites sans doute autorité en matière de trolls,
mais
vos opinions sur les newsgroups et sur linux en général, je vous
conseille
de ne les utiliser qu'en suppositoires. Voilà ! Et encore, pour enfant.
Remarque que tu donnes toujours dans la même matière !
Michel
--
Tuxophiles, bien sûr que nous sommes tuxophiles, et winophobes en plus.
Mais il ne faut pas confondre tuxophilie et tuxo-intégrisme, l'amalgame
est fait beaucoup trop rapidement par les winophiles-tuxophobes .
T'es un peu en retard sur les nouvelles. Voir Dunc Tank.
Faut-il nécessairement changer d'opinion lorsque la réalité ne change
pas?
La nouvelle, ici, c'est qu'il n'y a plus que moi qui croit que
l'attitude d'affrontement de ce crétin de Hocevar ne vaudra rien à Debian.