J'ai toutes les peines du monde =E0 faire la transition de TeX de Sarge ver=
s Etch.
M=EAme en purgeant totalement mon ancienne installation (ce qui est un
comble pour une migration...), impossible d'installer TeTeX :
# aptitude install tetex-bin
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des d=E9pendances... Fait
Lecture de l'information d'=E9tat =E9tendu
Initialisation de l'=E9tat des paquets... Fait
=C9criture de l'information d'=E9tat =E9tendu... Fait
Lecture des descriptions de t=E2ches... Fait
Construction de la base de donn=E9es des =E9tiquettes... Fait
Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants vont =EAtre automatiquement install=E9s :
tetex-base tetex-doc
Les paquets suivants ont =E9t=E9 conserv=E9s :
libavcodeccvs51 libavformatcvs51 libavutilcvs49 libpostproccvs51
mplayer-skin-blue
Les NOUVEAUX paquets suivants vont =EAtre install=E9s :
tetex-base tetex-bin tetex-doc
0 paquets mis =E0 jour, 3 nouvellement install=E9s, 0 =E0 enlever et 5 non =
mis =E0 jour.
Il est n=E9cessaire de t=E9l=E9charger 0o/70,7Mo d'archives. Apr=E8s
d=E9paquetage, 147Mo seront utilis=E9s.
Voulez-vous continuer ? [Y/n/?]
=C9criture de l'information d'=E9tat =E9tendu... Fait
S=E9lection du paquet tetex-base pr=E9c=E9demment d=E9s=E9lectionn=E9.
(Lecture de la base de donn=E9es... 226612 fichiers et r=E9pertoires d=E9j=
=E0
install=E9s.)
D=E9paquetage de tetex-base (=E0 partir de .../tetex-base_3.0.dfsg.3-5_all.=
deb) ...
S=E9lection du paquet tetex-bin pr=E9c=E9demment d=E9s=E9lectionn=E9.
D=E9paquetage de tetex-bin (=E0 partir de .../tetex-bin_3.0-30_i386.deb) ..=
.
S=E9lection du paquet tetex-doc pr=E9c=E9demment d=E9s=E9lectionn=E9.
D=E9paquetage de tetex-doc (=E0 partir de .../tetex-doc_3.0.dfsg.3-5_all.de=
b) ...
Param=E9trage de tetex-base (3.0.dfsg.3-5) ...
done
Creating config file /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc with new version
Param=E9trage de tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
Creating config file /etc/texmf/fmt.d/01tetex.cnf with new version
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time... done.
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time...
updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in:
/tmp/tetex.updmap.sca12357
Please include this file if you report a bug.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de tetex-bin (--configure) :
le sous-processus post-installation script a retourn=E9 une erreur de
sortie d'=E9tat 1
Param=E9trage de tetex-doc (3.0.dfsg.3-5) ...
mktexlsr: Skipping /root/texmf
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/texmf.local/macros/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/cache/fonts/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Des erreurs ont =E9t=E9 rencontr=E9es pendant l'ex=E9cution :
tetex-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
=C9chec de l'installation d'un paquet. Tentative de r=E9paration :
Param=E9trage de tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time... done.
Running updmap-sys. This may take some time...
updmap-sys failed. Output has been stored in:
/tmp/tetex.updmap.dfY13015
Please include this file if you report a bug.
dpkg : erreur de traitement de tetex-bin (--configure) :
le sous-processus post-installation script a retourn=E9 une erreur de
sortie d'=E9tat 1
Des erreurs ont =E9t=E9 rencontr=E9es pendant l'ex=E9cution :
tetex-bin
Bon, et on a en plus :
# cat /tmp/tetex.updmap.sca12357
updmap-sys: This is updmap-sys, version 1107552857-debian
updmap-sys: using transcript file `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap-sys.log'
updmap is creating new map files using the following configuration:
prefer outlines: `true'
texhash enabled: `true'
download standard fonts (dvips): `false'
download standard fonts (pdftex): `true'
download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `true'
updmap-sys: Scanning for LW35 support files
!!! ERROR! The map file `dvips35.map' has not been found at all.
Either put this file into the right place or remove the
reference from the configuration files - see
update-updmap(1).
Jusque l=E0, je comprends (enfin, j'admets, ce qui est diff=E9rent). Mais
ensuite, impossible de virer ce (censur=E9) de fichier... j'ai beau
=E9dit=E9 dans tous les sens le fichier /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg
comme indiqu=E9 dans le fichier `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg' et
passer un coup de update-updmap, rien n'y fait : j'ai toujours cette
erreur..
Une id=E9e avant que je r=E9troporte l'ancienne version ?
Essaie la version texlive, je nâai pas eu de soucis avec.
-- Sylvain Sauvage
Claudux
Hello toutes et tous,
Ben, je ne suis pas dans la merde alors :
# dpkg -L tetex-bin | grep 35
^^^^^^^^^ euh, c’est censé être dans tetex-base, pas -bin...
Bon, semblerait que cela ait été releasée un peu vite cette Etch...
Déjà, pour Sarge, TeTeX était foireux... je n'ai pas de bol :(
je ne fréquente pas Tetex :-) je ne peux guère vous aider... Par contre il y a eu cette annonce en nangliche que je copie/colle en espérant que cela serve !
"Dear fellow developers,
the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live 2007 to unstable. With this version, teTeX will vanish as a separate package and only continue to exist as transitional packages.
teTeX has been abandoned upstream. TeX Live, which uses most of the scripts developed for teTeX, is its successor in Debian (and elsewhere), and we do not plan to support both systems beyond the lifetime of etch.
The transitional packages were designed to give users a sensible choice of TeX stuff, depending on whether they had tetex-extra or only tetex-bin installed.
They were *not* designed to minimize breakage for packages which build-depend on teTeX: Be therefore prepared to experience some breakage. Note that many packages use a TeX system to create PS or PDF documenation even if they do not explicitly Build-Depend on tetex, by using debiandoc-sgml, linuxdoc-tools-latex or similar converters.
If you experience FTBFS problems (or, in the worst case, missing or buggy documents if the build system is too lazy in checking its results, or font substitutions occured), please send X-Debbugs-CC to We plan to use the usertags "builddep-tetex-ftbfs" and "builddep-tetex-buggy" for those cases (for the user ).
HOWTO fix you package:
There is no simple receipe for finding out which texlive packages are needed. For the case of using TeX at package build time, the best approach is probably to try it out[1]. The same is true for packages which generate LaTeX code. For other cases, it's up to the maintainer to decide which dependencies are needed, and maybe which Recommends. You can always ask on the list.
For the TeX Task Force, Frank
[1] Ideally one should also compare the resulting DVI or PDF files and look for font problems, in particular Type 3 fonts. pdffonts from xpdf-utils is handy for that. -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Essaie la version texlive, je n’ai pas eu de soucis avec.
Bonne journée à tous Claude
-- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs "From" et "Reply-To:"
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hello toutes et tous,
Ben, je ne suis pas dans la merde alors :
# dpkg -L tetex-bin | grep 35
^^^^^^^^^
euh, c’est censé être dans tetex-base, pas -bin...
Bon, semblerait que cela ait été releasée un peu vite cette Etch...
Déjà, pour Sarge, TeTeX était foireux... je n'ai pas de bol :(
je ne fréquente pas Tetex :-) je ne peux guère vous aider...
Par contre il y a eu cette annonce en nangliche que je copie/colle en
espérant que cela serve !
"Dear fellow developers,
the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live
2007 to unstable. With this version, teTeX will vanish as a separate
package and only continue to exist as transitional packages.
teTeX has been abandoned upstream. TeX Live, which uses most of the
scripts developed for teTeX, is its successor in Debian (and elsewhere),
and we do not plan to support both systems beyond the lifetime of etch.
The transitional packages were designed to give users a sensible choice
of TeX stuff, depending on whether they had tetex-extra or only
tetex-bin installed.
They were *not* designed to minimize breakage for packages which
build-depend on teTeX: Be therefore prepared to experience some
breakage. Note that many packages use a TeX system to create PS or PDF
documenation even if they do not explicitly Build-Depend on tetex, by
using debiandoc-sgml, linuxdoc-tools-latex or similar converters.
If you experience FTBFS problems (or, in the worst case, missing or
buggy documents if the build system is too lazy in checking its results,
or font substitutions occured), please send X-Debbugs-CC to
debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org. We plan to use the usertags
"builddep-tetex-ftbfs" and "builddep-tetex-buggy" for those cases (for
the user debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org).
HOWTO fix you package:
There is no simple receipe for finding out which texlive packages are
needed. For the case of using TeX at package build time, the best
approach is probably to try it out[1]. The same is
true for packages which generate LaTeX code. For other cases, it's up
to the maintainer to decide which dependencies are needed, and maybe
which Recommends. You can always ask on the list.
For the TeX Task Force,
Frank
[1] Ideally one should also compare the resulting DVI or PDF files and
look for font problems, in particular Type 3 fonts. pdffonts from
xpdf-utils is handy for that.
-- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @
Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Essaie la version texlive, je n’ai pas eu de soucis avec.
Bonne journée à tous
Claude
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench
Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs "From" et
"Reply-To:"
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-french-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
^^^^^^^^^ euh, c’est censé être dans tetex-base, pas -bin...
Bon, semblerait que cela ait été releasée un peu vite cette Etch...
Déjà, pour Sarge, TeTeX était foireux... je n'ai pas de bol :(
je ne fréquente pas Tetex :-) je ne peux guère vous aider... Par contre il y a eu cette annonce en nangliche que je copie/colle en espérant que cela serve !
"Dear fellow developers,
the Debian TeX Task force is currently preparing an upload of TeX Live 2007 to unstable. With this version, teTeX will vanish as a separate package and only continue to exist as transitional packages.
teTeX has been abandoned upstream. TeX Live, which uses most of the scripts developed for teTeX, is its successor in Debian (and elsewhere), and we do not plan to support both systems beyond the lifetime of etch.
The transitional packages were designed to give users a sensible choice of TeX stuff, depending on whether they had tetex-extra or only tetex-bin installed.
They were *not* designed to minimize breakage for packages which build-depend on teTeX: Be therefore prepared to experience some breakage. Note that many packages use a TeX system to create PS or PDF documenation even if they do not explicitly Build-Depend on tetex, by using debiandoc-sgml, linuxdoc-tools-latex or similar converters.
If you experience FTBFS problems (or, in the worst case, missing or buggy documents if the build system is too lazy in checking its results, or font substitutions occured), please send X-Debbugs-CC to We plan to use the usertags "builddep-tetex-ftbfs" and "builddep-tetex-buggy" for those cases (for the user ).
HOWTO fix you package:
There is no simple receipe for finding out which texlive packages are needed. For the case of using TeX at package build time, the best approach is probably to try it out[1]. The same is true for packages which generate LaTeX code. For other cases, it's up to the maintainer to decide which dependencies are needed, and maybe which Recommends. You can always ask on the list.
For the TeX Task Force, Frank
[1] Ideally one should also compare the resulting DVI or PDF files and look for font problems, in particular Type 3 fonts. pdffonts from xpdf-utils is handy for that. -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Essaie la version texlive, je n’ai pas eu de soucis avec.
Bonne journée à tous Claude
-- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs "From" et "Reply-To:"
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Patrice Karatchentzeff
2007/4/12, Claudux :
[...]
je ne fréquente pas Tetex :-) je ne peux guère vous aider... Par contre il y a eu cette annonce en nangliche que je copie/colle en espérant que cela serve !
je ne fréquente pas Tetex :-) je ne peux guère vous aider...
Par contre il y a eu cette annonce en nangliche que je copie/colle en
espérant que cela serve !
je ne fréquente pas Tetex :-) je ne peux guère vous aider... Par contre il y a eu cette annonce en nangliche que je copie/colle en espérant que cela serve !
