"Core to KVM’s rapid success is the fact that it’s included in the kernel. In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but since 2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do some configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make it work. That’s a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT staff. By contrast, since KVM’s inclusion in the kernel and declared support from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting a KVM environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors."
En clair, si KVM s'est imposé, c'est qu'il est inclus dans le noyau. Et qu'il fonctionne bien.
-- Frederic Bezies - Blog : http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/
Le Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:46:17 +0200, P4nd1-P4nd4 a écrit :
P4nd1-P4nd4 avait prétendu :
AHahahah, c'est juste 10 ans trop tard
Heureusment qu'il y'a des produits sérieux comme Hyper-V ou VMware...
"Core to KVM’s rapid success is the fact that it’s included in the kernel.
In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but since
2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do some
configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make it
work. That’s a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT staff.
By contrast, since KVM’s inclusion in the kernel and declared support
from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting a KVM
environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors."
En clair, si KVM s'est imposé, c'est qu'il est inclus dans le noyau. Et
qu'il fonctionne bien.
--
Frederic Bezies - fredbezies@gmail.com
Blog : http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/
"Core to KVM’s rapid success is the fact that it’s included in the kernel. In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but since 2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do some configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make it work. That’s a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT staff. By contrast, since KVM’s inclusion in the kernel and declared support from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting a KVM environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors."
En clair, si KVM s'est imposé, c'est qu'il est inclus dans le noyau. Et qu'il fonctionne bien.
-- Frederic Bezies - Blog : http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/
totof01
On 9 juin, 21:40, Frederic Bezies wrote:
Le Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:46:17 +0200, P4nd1-P4nd4 a écrit :
> P4nd1-P4nd4 avait prétendu : >> AHahahah, c'est juste 10 ans trop tard
>> Heureusment qu'il y'a des produits sérieux comme Hyper-V ou VMware.. .
"Core to KVMs rapid success is the fact that its included in the ke rnel. In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but since 2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do some configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make it work. Thats a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT staf f. By contrast, since KVMs inclusion in the kernel and declared support from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting a KVM environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors."
En clair, si KVM s'est imposé, c'est qu'il est inclus dans le noyau. Et qu'il fonctionne bien.
-- Frederic Bezies - Blog :http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/
En plus de ça, le P4, est-ce qu'il sait sur quoi se base Xen ?
On 9 juin, 21:40, Frederic Bezies <fredbez...@gmail.com> wrote:
Le Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:46:17 +0200, P4nd1-P4nd4 a écrit :
> P4nd1-P4nd4 avait prétendu :
>> AHahahah, c'est juste 10 ans trop tard
>> Heureusment qu'il y'a des produits sérieux comme Hyper-V ou VMware.. .
"Core to KVMs rapid success is the fact that its included in the ke rnel.
In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but since
2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do some
configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make it
work. Thats a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT staf f.
By contrast, since KVMs inclusion in the kernel and declared support
from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting a KVM
environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors."
En clair, si KVM s'est imposé, c'est qu'il est inclus dans le noyau. Et
qu'il fonctionne bien.
--
Frederic Bezies - fredbez...@gmail.com
Blog :http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/
En plus de ça, le P4, est-ce qu'il sait sur quoi se base Xen ?
"Core to KVMs rapid success is the fact that its included in the ke rnel. In contrast, Xen has always worked well on Linux platforms, but since 2007 users have needed to apply a significant kernel patch and do some configuration not included in the core Linux distributions to make it work. Thats a headache and a support issue for OSS vendors and IT staf f. By contrast, since KVMs inclusion in the kernel and declared support from the major distributions such as Red Hat and Ubuntu, getting a KVM environment going is easier and also encouraged by the distributors."
En clair, si KVM s'est imposé, c'est qu'il est inclus dans le noyau. Et qu'il fonctionne bien.
-- Frederic Bezies - Blog :http://frederic.bezies.free.fr/blog/
En plus de ça, le P4, est-ce qu'il sait sur quoi se base Xen ?
