Cette action est irreversible, confirmez la suppression du commentaire ?
Signaler le commentaire
Veuillez sélectionner un problème
Nudité
Violence
Harcèlement
Fraude
Vente illégale
Discours haineux
Terrorisme
Autre
yl
In article , P4nd1-P4nd4 writes:
Mais spectaculaire montée de W7 !!!
Ridicule. Au profit de quoi wintoy gagne ? du wintoyprécédent. C'est un phénomène normal. Quand wintoy fera chez tout le monde les jolis écrans noirs, les gens ne jetteront pas leur ordi dernier cri mais y mettront un vrai système d'exploitation.
-- http://mikeread.tripod.com/archive.htm
In article <POqdnaZW6v6b99_WnZ2dnUVZ8nadnZ2d@giganews.com>,
P4nd1-P4nd4 <P4nd1-P4nd4@.net> writes:
Mais spectaculaire montée de W7 !!!
Ridicule. Au profit de quoi wintoy gagne ? du wintoyprécédent. C'est un
phénomène normal. Quand wintoy fera chez tout le monde les jolis écrans
noirs, les gens ne jetteront pas leur ordi dernier cri mais y mettront
un vrai système d'exploitation.
Ridicule. Au profit de quoi wintoy gagne ? du wintoyprécédent. C'est un phénomène normal. Quand wintoy fera chez tout le monde les jolis écrans noirs, les gens ne jetteront pas leur ordi dernier cri mais y mettront un vrai système d'exploitation.
-- http://mikeread.tripod.com/archive.htm
Stéphane CARPENTIER
Yves Lambert wrote:
C'est un phénomène normal. Quand wintoy fera chez tout le monde les jolis écrans noirs, les gens ne jetteront pas leur ordi dernier cri mais y mettront un vrai système d'exploitation.
Même pas. Windows 95 a très bien marché.
Yves Lambert wrote:
C'est un
phénomène normal. Quand wintoy fera chez tout le monde les jolis écrans
noirs, les gens ne jetteront pas leur ordi dernier cri mais y mettront
un vrai système d'exploitation.
C'est un phénomène normal. Quand wintoy fera chez tout le monde les jolis écrans noirs, les gens ne jetteront pas leur ordi dernier cri mais y mettront un vrai système d'exploitation.
Même pas. Windows 95 a très bien marché.
yl
In article <4b439b2d$0$11226$, Stéphane CARPENTIER writes:
Même pas. Windows 95 a très bien marché.
Un antidote :
8<--- From: (Linus Benedict Torvalds) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: What would you like to see most in minix? Summary: small poll for my new operating system Message-ID: Date: 25 Aug 91 20:57:08 GMT Organization: University of Helsinki
Hello everybody out there using minix -
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)
Linus ()
PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(. ---->8 -- http://mikeread.tripod.com/archive.htm
In article <4b439b2d$0$11226$426a34cc@news.free.fr>,
Stéphane CARPENTIER <stef.carpentier@gratuit.fr.invalid> writes:
Même pas. Windows 95 a très bien marché.
Un antidote :
8<---
From: torvalds@klaava.Helsinki.FI (Linus Benedict Torvalds)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: What would you like to see most in minix?
Summary: small poll for my new operating system
Message-ID: <1991Aug25.205708.9541@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
Date: 25 Aug 91 20:57:08 GMT
Organization: University of Helsinki
Hello everybody out there using minix -
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and
professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing
since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on
things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat
(same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons)
among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work.
This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and
I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions
are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)
Linus (torvalds@kruuna.helsinki.fi)
PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs.
It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never
will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(.
---->8
--
http://mikeread.tripod.com/archive.htm
In article <4b439b2d$0$11226$, Stéphane CARPENTIER writes:
Même pas. Windows 95 a très bien marché.
Un antidote :
8<--- From: (Linus Benedict Torvalds) Newsgroups: comp.os.minix Subject: What would you like to see most in minix? Summary: small poll for my new operating system Message-ID: Date: 25 Aug 91 20:57:08 GMT Organization: University of Helsinki
Hello everybody out there using minix -
I'm doing a (free) operating system (just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu) for 386(486) AT clones. This has been brewing since april, and is starting to get ready. I'd like any feedback on things people like/dislike in minix, as my OS resembles it somewhat (same physical layout of the file-system (due to practical reasons) among other things).
I've currently ported bash(1.08) and gcc(1.40), and things seem to work. This implies that I'll get something practical within a few months, and I'd like to know what features most people would want. Any suggestions are welcome, but I won't promise I'll implement them :-)
Linus ()
PS. Yes - it's free of any minix code, and it has a multi-threaded fs. It is NOT protable (uses 386 task switching etc), and it probably never will support anything other than AT-harddisks, as that's all I have :-(. ---->8 -- http://mikeread.tripod.com/archive.htm
