--
een appeltje te schillen met http://applefaulty.be
http://users.fulladsl.be/spb13810/bwnl.htm
Breng je iMac G5 terug (ik wil binnen 2 jaar geen defecte 2de hands Apple kopen)
http://www.apple.com/nl/support/imac/repairextensionprogram/
I'm not a user but I'll say this: "Too Expensive!"
I look forward to an affordable DRM receiver, if it is truly the future of shortwave.
--
acs
--- Grundig Satellit 800M, Degen 1102, FR200, 100' Random Wire, Degen "31" Amplified Loop, Pulling signals out of thin air in the Pacific Northwest Since 1992 <http://www.chevyorange.com>
On 2006-04-01 10:53:32 -0800, switcher <no@KijkenZeHierOokAlNaar.be> said:
I'm not a user but I'll say this: "Too Expensive!"
I look forward to an affordable DRM receiver, if it is truly the future
of shortwave.
--
acs
---
Grundig Satellit 800M, Degen 1102, FR200,
100' Random Wire, Degen "31" Amplified Loop,
Pulling signals out of thin air in the Pacific Northwest Since 1992
<http://www.chevyorange.com>
I'm not a user but I'll say this: "Too Expensive!"
I look forward to an affordable DRM receiver, if it is truly the future of shortwave.
--
acs
--- Grundig Satellit 800M, Degen 1102, FR200, 100' Random Wire, Degen "31" Amplified Loop, Pulling signals out of thin air in the Pacific Northwest Since 1992 <http://www.chevyorange.com>
It'll go the way of AM stereo. Don't even sweat it.
Han
Hello everyone
I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the solution. Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW bands!
Greetings Han , the Netherlands
You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio stations below 30 MHz http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html
Hello everyone
I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the
solution.
Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW
bands!
Greetings Han , the Netherlands
You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio
stations below 30 MHz
http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html
I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the solution. Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW bands!
Greetings Han , the Netherlands
You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio stations below 30 MHz http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html
David
On 2 Apr 2006 00:47:17 -0800, "Han" wrote:
Hello everyone
I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the solution. Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW bands!
Greetings Han , the Netherlands
You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio stations below 30 MHz http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html
Analog is rapidly becoming obsolete. It threatens the fascists.
On 2 Apr 2006 00:47:17 -0800, "Han" <websitehan@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hello everyone
I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the
solution.
Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW
bands!
Greetings Han , the Netherlands
You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio
stations below 30 MHz
http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html
Analog is rapidly becoming obsolete. It threatens the fascists.
I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the solution. Drm sounds good and I would like it to be the future, but in special SW bands!
Greetings Han , the Netherlands
You can also visit my website with a lot of recordings from radio stations below 30 MHz http://home.wanadoo.nl/hanhardonk/indexengels.html
Analog is rapidly becoming obsolete. It threatens the fascists.
Arnaud
hey. please observe the language of the group you are posting in. fr.rec.radio this is french.
Thanks.
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:54:46 +0200, "François Guillet" wrote:
"Han" a écrit dans le message de news:
| Hello everyone | | I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the | solution.
It's not a solution for the broadcasters. They would have to spend twice for broadcasting the same program for all listeners. They couldn't use the same transmitter/antenna to move from analog to digital if the band changed. Furthermore this would waste frequency resources.
hey. please observe the language of the group you are posting in.
fr.rec.radio this is french.
"Han" <websitehan@yahoo.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1143967637.876362.115650@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
| Hello everyone
|
| I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the
| solution.
It's not a solution for the broadcasters. They would have to spend twice for
broadcasting the same program for all listeners. They couldn't use the same
transmitter/antenna to move from analog to digital if the band changed.
Furthermore this would waste frequency resources.
hey. please observe the language of the group you are posting in. fr.rec.radio this is french.
Thanks.
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 16:54:46 +0200, "François Guillet" wrote:
"Han" a écrit dans le message de news:
| Hello everyone | | I think seperate bands for "normal" broadcast and DRM would be the | solution.
It's not a solution for the broadcasters. They would have to spend twice for broadcasting the same program for all listeners. They couldn't use the same transmitter/antenna to move from analog to digital if the band changed. Furthermore this would waste frequency resources.
