Depuis 2 ou 3 jours, je constate que de nouveaux programmes radio sont
dispo =E0 Nevers (rire et chansons, RMC, MFM...). J'en conclus que la
mise en place d'un nouveau plan de fr=E9quences est effective en r=E9gion
Bourgogne.
Je ne retrouve plus l'annuaire web =E9dit=E9 par l'un des participants de
ce forum, d=E9j=E0 disponible pourtant il y a plusieurs mois et qui
incorporait dej=E0 ces nouveaut=E9s avec leurs fr=E9quences exactes.
many women in the parade, and girls too. They were on horseback, in sedan chairs, borne on wheeled platforms, like our "Goddess of Liberty" representations on the Fourth of July; walking, and sometimes riding on bullocks. We counted 150 women in all. These were dressed and painted up in such a style that a single glance showed they belonged to the disreputable class, and their old "pocket-mothers," were to be seen walking along close to them and keeping a sharp lookout over their gaudily dressed slaves. Yet more painful was the sight of the little girls, bound to heavy wires and placed in all manner of contortions. Here was a girl about sixteen, standing cross-legged on a moving platform, holding a spear in each hand, the spears crossed in front of her breast, and a little girl dangling from each spear-point. So it appeared, but in fact all were well wired into the distressing shape they occupied, and it was said that none of them could have endured the position for a moment but for plentiful doses of opium. Next passed a girl standing on the moving platform, holding a spear at arm's length, and a three-year-old girl standing on its point. Then a little boy holding a long rod from which was suspen
many
women in the parade, and girls too. They were on horseback, in sedan
chairs, borne on wheeled platforms, like our "Goddess of Liberty"
representations on the Fourth of July; walking, and sometimes riding
on bullocks. We counted 150 women in all. These were dressed and
painted up in such a style that a single glance showed they belonged
to the disreputable class, and their old "pocket-mothers," were to
be seen walking along close to them and keeping a sharp lookout over
their gaudily dressed slaves. Yet more painful was the sight of
the little girls, bound to heavy wires and placed in all manner of
contortions. Here was a girl about sixteen, standing cross-legged on a
moving platform, holding a spear in each hand, the spears crossed in
front of her breast, and a little girl dangling from each spear-point.
So it appeared, but in fact all were well wired into the distressing
shape they occupied, and it was said that none of them could have
endured the position for a moment but for plentiful doses of opium.
Next passed a girl standing on the moving platform, holding a spear at
arm's length, and a three-year-old girl standing on its point. Then a
little boy holding a long rod from which was suspen
many women in the parade, and girls too. They were on horseback, in sedan chairs, borne on wheeled platforms, like our "Goddess of Liberty" representations on the Fourth of July; walking, and sometimes riding on bullocks. We counted 150 women in all. These were dressed and painted up in such a style that a single glance showed they belonged to the disreputable class, and their old "pocket-mothers," were to be seen walking along close to them and keeping a sharp lookout over their gaudily dressed slaves. Yet more painful was the sight of the little girls, bound to heavy wires and placed in all manner of contortions. Here was a girl about sixteen, standing cross-legged on a moving platform, holding a spear in each hand, the spears crossed in front of her breast, and a little girl dangling from each spear-point. So it appeared, but in fact all were well wired into the distressing shape they occupied, and it was said that none of them could have endured the position for a moment but for plentiful doses of opium. Next passed a girl standing on the moving platform, holding a spear at arm's length, and a three-year-old girl standing on its point. Then a little boy holding a long rod from which was suspen
pgueny
looks down on the Inspector of Brothels." Dr. Ayres tells us: "You cannot get men fitted for the work at present salaries, and you have to put tremendous powers into the hands of men like those we have."
Yet into the hands of men lower in character than the lowest of the police force was committed, in large part, the operation of Ordinance 12, 1857, recommended by Mr. Labouchere as a sort of benevolent scheme for the defense of poor Chinese slaves under the British flag, who had "an urgent claim on the protection of Government."
CHAPTER 3.
HOW THE PROTECTOR PROTECTED.
Dr. Bridges, the Acting Attorney General at Hong Kong, who had framed the Contagious Diseases Ordinance of 1857, had given an assurance concerning it expressed in the following words: "There will be less difficulty in dealing with prostitution in this Colony than with the same in any other part of the world, as I believe the prostitutes here to be almost, without exception, Chinese who would be thankful to be placed under medical control of any kind; that few if any of the prostitutes are free agents, having been brought up for the purposes of prostitution by the keepers of brothels, and that whether as regards the unfortunate creatures themselves, the persons who obtain a living by these prostitutes, or the Chinese inhabitants in general, there are fewer rights to be interfered with here, less grounds for complaint by the parties controlled, and fewer prejudices on the subject to be shocked among the more respectable part of the community than could be found elsewhere." Mr. D.R. Caldwell, Protector, confirmed these views. But the views of the Chinese themselves had never been elicited, and immediately
looks down on the Inspector of
Brothels." Dr. Ayres tells us: "You cannot get men fitted for the work
at present salaries, and you have to put tremendous powers into the
hands of men like those we have."
Yet into the hands of men lower in character than the lowest of the
police force was committed, in large part, the operation of Ordinance
12, 1857, recommended by Mr. Labouchere as a sort of benevolent scheme
for the defense of poor Chinese slaves under the British flag, who had
"an urgent claim on the protection of Government."
CHAPTER 3.
HOW THE PROTECTOR PROTECTED.
Dr. Bridges, the Acting Attorney General at Hong Kong, who had framed
the Contagious Diseases Ordinance of 1857, had given an assurance
concerning it expressed in the following words: "There will be less
difficulty in dealing with prostitution in this Colony than with the
same in any other part of the world, as I believe the prostitutes here
to be almost, without exception, Chinese who would be thankful to
be placed under medical control of any kind; that few if any of the
prostitutes are free agents, having been brought up for the purposes
of prostitution by the keepers of brothels, and that whether as
regards the unfortunate creatures themselves, the persons who obtain
a living by these prostitutes, or the Chinese inhabitants in general,
there are fewer rights to be interfered with here, less grounds for
complaint by the parties controlled, and fewer prejudices on the
subject to be shocked among the more respectable part of the community
than could be found elsewhere." Mr. D.R. Caldwell, Protector,
confirmed these views. But the views of the Chinese themselves had
never been elicited, and immediately
looks down on the Inspector of Brothels." Dr. Ayres tells us: "You cannot get men fitted for the work at present salaries, and you have to put tremendous powers into the hands of men like those we have."
Yet into the hands of men lower in character than the lowest of the police force was committed, in large part, the operation of Ordinance 12, 1857, recommended by Mr. Labouchere as a sort of benevolent scheme for the defense of poor Chinese slaves under the British flag, who had "an urgent claim on the protection of Government."
CHAPTER 3.
HOW THE PROTECTOR PROTECTED.
Dr. Bridges, the Acting Attorney General at Hong Kong, who had framed the Contagious Diseases Ordinance of 1857, had given an assurance concerning it expressed in the following words: "There will be less difficulty in dealing with prostitution in this Colony than with the same in any other part of the world, as I believe the prostitutes here to be almost, without exception, Chinese who would be thankful to be placed under medical control of any kind; that few if any of the prostitutes are free agents, having been brought up for the purposes of prostitution by the keepers of brothels, and that whether as regards the unfortunate creatures themselves, the persons who obtain a living by these prostitutes, or the Chinese inhabitants in general, there are fewer rights to be interfered with here, less grounds for complaint by the parties controlled, and fewer prejudices on the subject to be shocked among the more respectable part of the community than could be found elsewhere." Mr. D.R. Caldwell, Protector, confirmed these views. But the views of the Chinese themselves had never been elicited, and immediately
Mixture
On 2008-01-21 22:31:07 +0100, Nicolas Croiset said:
Mixture wrote :
On 2008-01-21 18:28:13 +0100, Nicolas Croiset said:
base interne j'ai la donnée officielle et la donnée officieuse quand elle est dispo, mais je ne publie que la donnée officielle excepté
Amusant, j'ai fait de même pour les puissances d'émission : la puissance affichée est toujours la puissance officielle mais pour certaines radios, c'est la puissance officieuse qui est prise en compte.
Salut,
la puissance qui est de 3 dB supérieure à ce qui est autorisé est une pratique assez courante, il existe même un contrat "optimisé" auprès d'un diffuseur.
Ah oui ? Soit pour un émetteur autorisé à 1 kW, une puissance finale de 2 kW si on considère un gain de 3dB+. Il n'est pas rare d'avoir aussi des radios qui multiplient par 10 leur puissance autorisée.
On 2008-01-21 22:31:07 +0100, Nicolas Croiset <nicolas.croiset@brume.org> said:
Mixture <mixture.fr@hotmail.fr> wrote :
On 2008-01-21 18:28:13 +0100, Nicolas Croiset <nicolas.croiset@brume.org> said:
base interne j'ai la donnée officielle et la donnée officieuse quand
elle est dispo, mais je ne publie que la donnée officielle excepté
Amusant, j'ai fait de même pour les puissances d'émission : la
puissance affichée est toujours la puissance officielle mais pour
certaines radios, c'est la puissance officieuse qui est prise en compte.
Salut,
la puissance qui est de 3 dB supérieure à ce qui est autorisé est une
pratique assez courante, il existe même un contrat "optimisé" auprès
d'un diffuseur.
Ah oui ? Soit pour un émetteur autorisé à 1 kW, une puissance finale de
2 kW si on considère un gain de 3dB+. Il n'est pas rare d'avoir aussi
des radios qui multiplient par 10 leur puissance autorisée.
On 2008-01-21 22:31:07 +0100, Nicolas Croiset said:
Mixture wrote :
On 2008-01-21 18:28:13 +0100, Nicolas Croiset said:
base interne j'ai la donnée officielle et la donnée officieuse quand elle est dispo, mais je ne publie que la donnée officielle excepté
Amusant, j'ai fait de même pour les puissances d'émission : la puissance affichée est toujours la puissance officielle mais pour certaines radios, c'est la puissance officieuse qui est prise en compte.
Salut,
la puissance qui est de 3 dB supérieure à ce qui est autorisé est une pratique assez courante, il existe même un contrat "optimisé" auprès d'un diffuseur.
Ah oui ? Soit pour un émetteur autorisé à 1 kW, une puissance finale de 2 kW si on considère un gain de 3dB+. Il n'est pas rare d'avoir aussi des radios qui multiplient par 10 leur puissance autorisée.
Mixture
On 2008-01-22 12:11:12 +0100, Nicolas Croiset said:
La multiplexation par 10 est extrémement rare, je connais moins de 5 cas, et encore généralement la sanction tombe car il y a forcément un brouillage quelque part.
3dB se repère beucoup moins donc c'est plus difficilement vérifiable.
Oui, c'est très rare et en général, cela concerne des radios autorisées à faible puissance (disons 50W) qui gonflent leur puissance jusqu'à 500W...
On 2008-01-22 12:11:12 +0100, Nicolas Croiset <nicolas.croiset@brume.org> said:
La multiplexation par 10 est extrémement rare, je connais moins de 5
cas, et encore généralement la sanction tombe car il y a forcément un
brouillage quelque part.
3dB se repère beucoup moins donc c'est plus difficilement vérifiable.
Oui, c'est très rare et en général, cela concerne des radios autorisées
à faible puissance (disons 50W) qui gonflent leur puissance jusqu'à
500W...
On 2008-01-22 12:11:12 +0100, Nicolas Croiset said:
La multiplexation par 10 est extrémement rare, je connais moins de 5 cas, et encore généralement la sanction tombe car il y a forcément un brouillage quelque part.
3dB se repère beucoup moins donc c'est plus difficilement vérifiable.
Oui, c'est très rare et en général, cela concerne des radios autorisées à faible puissance (disons 50W) qui gonflent leur puissance jusqu'à 500W...
