Je ne suis pas du tout un pro de la photo, mais j'ai fait quelque clichés qui m'ont impressionné, y compris le soir.
Je me réjouis de faire d'autres photos !
Olivier
koko13
Certes, mais DpReview précise bien le détail suivant :
Note: Due to our standard lighting setup being too bright for the F30's higher ISO settings all the F30 comparison shots were taken with an ND4 filter over the light source (2 stops less light).
Ce détail peut il avoir une influence sur le résultat en compraison avec le Ixus 800 par exeemple ???? I D'nt know.
Certes, mais DpReview précise bien le détail suivant :
Note: Due to our standard lighting setup being too bright for the F30's
higher ISO settings all the F30 comparison shots were taken with an ND4
filter over the light source (2 stops less light).
Ce détail peut il avoir une influence sur le résultat en compraison avec le
Ixus 800 par exeemple ???? I D'nt know.
Certes, mais DpReview précise bien le détail suivant :
Note: Due to our standard lighting setup being too bright for the F30's higher ISO settings all the F30 comparison shots were taken with an ND4 filter over the light source (2 stops less light).
Ce détail peut il avoir une influence sur le résultat en compraison avec le Ixus 800 par exeemple ???? I D'nt know.
koko13
Et le commentaire à propos de la performance ISO 3200 n'est pas tendre : (toujours sur DpReview)
OK, so the Super CCD sensor has amazing high ISO capabilities, but it isn't magic, and once you get to ISO 1600 and above, in the words of the Starship Enterprise's chief engineer 'ye cannae change the laws of physics'. That said, the ISO 1600 result is still better by a wide margin than the F10, and - for small prints - might well get you out of a tight spot when light is very low. For snaps of friends and family in low light (faces don't need that much detail) the ISO 1600 setting would be, just about, usable. I wouldn't go to ISO 3200 unless I had no other way of getting the shot; the noise reduction is so extreme that most fine detail has been lost, and there is so much bleeding of color that the result looks a little like one of those magic coloring books after a good soaking.
That all said, the I've seen small-sensor compact cameras that produce ISO 400 results that look like the F30's ISO 1600 result, and the fact that you can shoot at ISO 3200 (something no other camera offers at full resolution) does make the F30 a very versatile camera indeed.
Et le commentaire à propos de la performance ISO 3200 n'est pas tendre :
(toujours sur DpReview)
OK, so the Super CCD sensor has amazing high ISO capabilities, but it isn't
magic, and once you get to ISO 1600 and above, in the words of the Starship
Enterprise's chief engineer 'ye cannae change the laws of physics'. That
said, the ISO 1600 result is still better by a wide margin than the F10,
and - for small prints - might well get you out of a tight spot when light
is very low. For snaps of friends and family in low light (faces don't need
that much detail) the ISO 1600 setting would be, just about, usable. I
wouldn't go to ISO 3200 unless I had no other way of getting the shot; the
noise reduction is so extreme that most fine detail has been lost, and there
is so much bleeding of color that the result looks a little like one of
those magic coloring books after a good soaking.
That all said, the I've seen small-sensor compact cameras that produce ISO
400 results that look like the F30's ISO 1600 result, and the fact that you
can shoot at ISO 3200 (something no other camera offers at full resolution)
does make the F30 a very versatile camera indeed.
Et le commentaire à propos de la performance ISO 3200 n'est pas tendre : (toujours sur DpReview)
OK, so the Super CCD sensor has amazing high ISO capabilities, but it isn't magic, and once you get to ISO 1600 and above, in the words of the Starship Enterprise's chief engineer 'ye cannae change the laws of physics'. That said, the ISO 1600 result is still better by a wide margin than the F10, and - for small prints - might well get you out of a tight spot when light is very low. For snaps of friends and family in low light (faces don't need that much detail) the ISO 1600 setting would be, just about, usable. I wouldn't go to ISO 3200 unless I had no other way of getting the shot; the noise reduction is so extreme that most fine detail has been lost, and there is so much bleeding of color that the result looks a little like one of those magic coloring books after a good soaking.
That all said, the I've seen small-sensor compact cameras that produce ISO 400 results that look like the F30's ISO 1600 result, and the fact that you can shoot at ISO 3200 (something no other camera offers at full resolution) does make the F30 a very versatile camera indeed.
