[FM] Nouvelles autorisations CTR de Nancy, cette nuit.
15 réponses
Thierry VIGNAUD
Pour info, cette nuit, une NEVA (Nuit d’Entrée en Vigueur des Autorisations)
selon le terme consacré par le CSA, concerne le CTR de Nancy.
Même si le CSA semble bien muet par rapport aux précédentes NEVA, il reste les
anciens liens :
Le plan de fréquence dynamique, mais dépassé qui ne tient pas compte de la
modification (retrait du 93,5 MHz de Besançon pour diffusion du Mouv')
http://www.csa.fr/actualite/decisions/radio_plan_frequences_tableau.php?plan=dijon_20070213
La liste des candidats sélectionnés
http://www.csa.fr/actualite/communiques/communiques_detail.php?id=123958
thierry.vignaud@no-spam_laposte.net
Emetteurs radio et TV :
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/tvignaud
wrote in news:d5d07302-b3ed-4490-945c-a1b1dd3b5026 @e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
Pour le coup, il me semble que sur Beaune, le 101,1 de Gex devrait être mieux reçu que le 101,2 local à Dijon. A confirmer sur place.
C'est certain, mais le tout c'est que le 101,2 ne moustache pas trop le Mont Rond. En mono, il y a plus de marge qu'en stéréo, c'est sans doute gérable, y compris en mobilité. Et il y a aussi dans certains cas de figure le 100,7 du Mont St Vincent qui peut être mis à contribution.
-- A+,
Olivier
mixture.fr@hotmail.fr wrote in news:d5d07302-b3ed-4490-945c-a1b1dd3b5026
@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
Pour le coup, il me semble que sur Beaune, le 101,1 de Gex devrait
être mieux reçu que le 101,2 local à Dijon. A confirmer sur place.
C'est certain, mais le tout c'est que le 101,2 ne moustache pas trop le Mont
Rond. En mono, il y a plus de marge qu'en stéréo, c'est sans doute gérable, y
compris en mobilité. Et il y a aussi dans certains cas de figure le 100,7 du
Mont St Vincent qui peut être mis à contribution.
wrote in news:d5d07302-b3ed-4490-945c-a1b1dd3b5026 @e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com:
Pour le coup, il me semble que sur Beaune, le 101,1 de Gex devrait être mieux reçu que le 101,2 local à Dijon. A confirmer sur place.
C'est certain, mais le tout c'est que le 101,2 ne moustache pas trop le Mont Rond. En mono, il y a plus de marge qu'en stéréo, c'est sans doute gérable, y compris en mobilité. Et il y a aussi dans certains cas de figure le 100,7 du Mont St Vincent qui peut être mis à contribution.
-- A+,
Olivier
Thierry VIGNAUD
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:41:03 +0100, Denis wrote:
Thierry VIGNAUD a écrit :
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:46:35 -0800 (PST), wrote:
A part ça, France Info émet désormais à Dijon sur la fréquence 101,2 MHz. Elle est indiquée sur le site Internet de Radio France et m'a été indiquée par un correspondant sur place.
C'est de la mise à jour fraîche !
TDF ce n'est pas le CSA, mais ils ont au moins mis un PDF des nouvelles fréquences et des modifications du CTR de Dijon, mais celle-là n'était pas mentionnée : http://www.tdf.fr/medias/view/?id3
Probablement que TDF n'est pas (plus) le diffuseur dans ce cas-là, comme chez moi depuis quelques mois, à Bourges.
C'est possible, mais pour d'autres CTR ils ont publié toutes les modifications y compris celles qui affectaient la concurrence comme Towercast.
Emetteurs radio et TV : http://pagesperso-orange.fr/tvignaud
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:41:03 +0100, Denis <yapadadresse@ici> wrote:
Thierry VIGNAUD a écrit :
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:46:35 -0800 (PST), mixture.fr@hotmail.fr wrote:
A part ça, France Info émet désormais à Dijon sur la fréquence 101,2
MHz. Elle est indiquée sur le site Internet de Radio France et m'a été
indiquée par un correspondant sur place.
C'est de la mise à jour fraîche !
TDF ce n'est pas le CSA, mais ils ont au moins mis un PDF des
nouvelles fréquences et des modifications du CTR de Dijon, mais
celle-là n'était pas mentionnée :
http://www.tdf.fr/medias/view/?id3
Probablement que TDF n'est pas (plus) le diffuseur dans ce cas-là, comme
chez moi depuis quelques mois, à Bourges.
C'est possible, mais pour d'autres CTR ils ont publié toutes les modifications
y compris celles qui affectaient la concurrence comme Towercast.
thierry.vignaud@no-spam_laposte.net
Emetteurs radio et TV :
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/tvignaud
A part ça, France Info émet désormais à Dijon sur la fréquence 101,2 MHz. Elle est indiquée sur le site Internet de Radio France et m'a été indiquée par un correspondant sur place.
C'est de la mise à jour fraîche !
TDF ce n'est pas le CSA, mais ils ont au moins mis un PDF des nouvelles fréquences et des modifications du CTR de Dijon, mais celle-là n'était pas mentionnée : http://www.tdf.fr/medias/view/?id3
Probablement que TDF n'est pas (plus) le diffuseur dans ce cas-là, comme chez moi depuis quelques mois, à Bourges.
C'est possible, mais pour d'autres CTR ils ont publié toutes les modifications y compris celles qui affectaient la concurrence comme Towercast.
Emetteurs radio et TV : http://pagesperso-orange.fr/tvignaud
Thierry VIGNAUD
Ça a bougé du côté du CSA, elles sont en ligne : http://www.csa.fr/actualite/decisions/decisions_detail.php?id5858
Emetteurs radio et TV : http://pagesperso-orange.fr/tvignaud
Ça a bougé du côté du CSA, elles sont en ligne :
http://www.csa.fr/actualite/decisions/decisions_detail.php?id5858
thierry.vignaud@no-spam_laposte.net
Emetteurs radio et TV :
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/tvignaud
Ça a bougé du côté du CSA, elles sont en ligne : http://www.csa.fr/actualite/decisions/decisions_detail.php?id5858
Emetteurs radio et TV : http://pagesperso-orange.fr/tvignaud
Nicolas Croiset
and gradually ... "The steps already taken have been with the object of protecting Chinese women from ill treatment and oppression in a state of life ... where the labour required is compulsory prostitution for the benefit of unscrupulous masters ... and secondly, in the interest of public order and decency ..." "always remembering that where the males so enormously outnumber the females, the prostitute is a necessary evil," "I have avoided any reference to the moral question," continues Mr. Swettenham, "Morality is dependent on the influence of climate, religious belief, education, and the feeling of society. All these conditions differ in different parts of the world."
CHAPTER 14.
PROTECTIVE ORDINANCES.
After eighteen years' hard struggle, the British Abolitionists succeeded in getting Parliament to repeal the Contagious Diseases Acts in force in certain military stations in England, and in force in other parts of the British Empire. It now became the duty of the Secretary of State for the Colonies to see that all the Crown Colonies, such as Hong Kong and Singapore followed suit. This was in 1886, and the Contagious Diseases Ordinances for these two places were not replaced by other legislation until 1888 at Singapore, and 1890 at Hong Kong. From what we have seen of the spirit of these officials in general it seems needless to say that the old Contagious Diseases Ordinances were repealed amid a storm of protests. One of the Municipal Commissioners of Singapore "said that the repeal of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance was the most cruel and merciless act which had ever been done." A statement from the unofficial members of the Legislative Council at Hong Kong declared: "In England abuses might have arisen under the recent law, but here it is impossible," and very much more of the same false nature. The new Ordinances are excellent reading, and in the hands of the right sort of officials
and gradually ... "The steps already taken have
been with the object of protecting Chinese women from ill treatment
and oppression in a state of life ... where the labour required is
compulsory prostitution for the benefit of unscrupulous masters ...
and secondly, in the interest of public order and decency ..." "always
remembering that where the males so enormously outnumber the females,
the prostitute is a necessary evil," "I have avoided any reference to
the moral question," continues Mr. Swettenham, "Morality is dependent
on the influence of climate, religious belief, education, and the
feeling of society. All these conditions differ in different parts of
the world."
CHAPTER 14.
PROTECTIVE ORDINANCES.
After eighteen years' hard struggle, the British Abolitionists
succeeded in getting Parliament to repeal the Contagious Diseases Acts
in force in certain military stations in England, and in force in
other parts of the British Empire. It now became the duty of the
Secretary of State for the Colonies to see that all the Crown
Colonies, such as Hong Kong and Singapore followed suit. This was in
1886, and the Contagious Diseases Ordinances for these two places were
not replaced by other legislation until 1888 at Singapore, and 1890 at
Hong Kong. From what we have seen of the spirit of these officials
in general it seems needless to say that the old Contagious Diseases
Ordinances were repealed amid a storm of protests. One of the
Municipal Commissioners of Singapore "said that the repeal of the
Contagious Diseases Ordinance was the most cruel and merciless act
which had ever been done." A statement from the unofficial members
of the Legislative Council at Hong Kong declared: "In England abuses
might have arisen under the recent law, but here it is impossible,"
and very much more of the same false nature. The new Ordinances are
excellent reading, and in the hands of the right sort of officials
and gradually ... "The steps already taken have been with the object of protecting Chinese women from ill treatment and oppression in a state of life ... where the labour required is compulsory prostitution for the benefit of unscrupulous masters ... and secondly, in the interest of public order and decency ..." "always remembering that where the males so enormously outnumber the females, the prostitute is a necessary evil," "I have avoided any reference to the moral question," continues Mr. Swettenham, "Morality is dependent on the influence of climate, religious belief, education, and the feeling of society. All these conditions differ in different parts of the world."
CHAPTER 14.
PROTECTIVE ORDINANCES.
After eighteen years' hard struggle, the British Abolitionists succeeded in getting Parliament to repeal the Contagious Diseases Acts in force in certain military stations in England, and in force in other parts of the British Empire. It now became the duty of the Secretary of State for the Colonies to see that all the Crown Colonies, such as Hong Kong and Singapore followed suit. This was in 1886, and the Contagious Diseases Ordinances for these two places were not replaced by other legislation until 1888 at Singapore, and 1890 at Hong Kong. From what we have seen of the spirit of these officials in general it seems needless to say that the old Contagious Diseases Ordinances were repealed amid a storm of protests. One of the Municipal Commissioners of Singapore "said that the repeal of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance was the most cruel and merciless act which had ever been done." A statement from the unofficial members of the Legislative Council at Hong Kong declared: "In England abuses might have arisen under the recent law, but here it is impossible," and very much more of the same false nature. The new Ordinances are excellent reading, and in the hands of the right sort of officials
Thierry VIGNAUD
better never admit that there is reason for complaint.
Note the calm admission of the Registrar General that nothing was being done to prevent the rearing of children in these registered brothels, where every detail was subject to Government surveillance. "It might be enacted," says the "Protector," that such a brothel-keeper should be "liable to a fine!" But why, in the face of such frank acknowledgement of the existence of slavery, were not the Queen's proclamation against slavery, and the many other enactments of the same sort, enforced? Listen, and we will tell why. These officials believed _vice was necessary_, and as there was no class of "fallen women," in our understanding of the term, the Oriental prostitute being a literal slave, then _slavery was necessary_ when it ministered to the vices of men. Hence the Government-registered brothels were filled with women slaves. As to the unregistered brothels, the "protected woman" protected that, and also the nursery of purchased and stolen children being brought up and trained for the slave market, excepting those children which, as we have seen, were being trained in the registered houses. If an officer attempted to enter the house of a "protected woman," he was told: "This is not a brothel. This is the private family residence of Mr. So and So," mentioning the name of some foreigner. Thus the foreigners who kept Chinese mistresses furnished, in effect, that protection to slavery that led the Chinese to go for
better never admit
that there is reason for complaint.
Note the calm admission of the Registrar General that nothing was
being done to prevent the rearing of children in these registered
brothels, where every detail was subject to Government surveillance.
"It might be enacted," says the "Protector," that such a
brothel-keeper should be "liable to a fine!" But why, in the face of
such frank acknowledgement of the existence of slavery, were not the
Queen's proclamation against slavery, and the many other enactments of
the same sort, enforced? Listen, and we will tell why. These officials
believed _vice was necessary_, and as there was no class of "fallen
women," in our understanding of the term, the Oriental prostitute
being a literal slave, then _slavery was necessary_ when it ministered
to the vices of men. Hence the Government-registered brothels were
filled with women slaves. As to the unregistered brothels, the
"protected woman" protected that, and also the nursery of purchased
and stolen children being brought up and trained for the slave market,
excepting those children which, as we have seen, were being trained in
the registered houses. If an officer attempted to enter the house of
a "protected woman," he was told: "This is not a brothel. This is the
private family residence of Mr. So and So," mentioning the name of
some foreigner. Thus the foreigners who kept Chinese mistresses
furnished, in effect, that protection to slavery that led the Chinese
to go for
better never admit that there is reason for complaint.
Note the calm admission of the Registrar General that nothing was being done to prevent the rearing of children in these registered brothels, where every detail was subject to Government surveillance. "It might be enacted," says the "Protector," that such a brothel-keeper should be "liable to a fine!" But why, in the face of such frank acknowledgement of the existence of slavery, were not the Queen's proclamation against slavery, and the many other enactments of the same sort, enforced? Listen, and we will tell why. These officials believed _vice was necessary_, and as there was no class of "fallen women," in our understanding of the term, the Oriental prostitute being a literal slave, then _slavery was necessary_ when it ministered to the vices of men. Hence the Government-registered brothels were filled with women slaves. As to the unregistered brothels, the "protected woman" protected that, and also the nursery of purchased and stolen children being brought up and trained for the slave market, excepting those children which, as we have seen, were being trained in the registered houses. If an officer attempted to enter the house of a "protected woman," he was told: "This is not a brothel. This is the private family residence of Mr. So and So," mentioning the name of some foreigner. Thus the foreigners who kept Chinese mistresses furnished, in effect, that protection to slavery that led the Chinese to go for
