Je souhaiterais passer d'Ubuntu à Debian sous peu. Mais avant je
voudrais savoir si Debian peut faire tourner les logiciels de son et
vidéo Mixbus et Da Vinci Resolve?
Cette action est irreversible, confirmez la suppression du commentaire ?
Signaler le commentaire
Veuillez sélectionner un problème
Nudité
Violence
Harcèlement
Fraude
Vente illégale
Discours haineux
Terrorisme
Autre
G2PC
Le 23/10/2018 à 13:37, a écrit :
Bonjour, Je souhaiterais passer d'Ubuntu à Debian sous peu. Mais avant je voudrais savoir si Debian peut faire tourner les logiciels de son et vidéo Mixbus et Da Vinci Resolve? Merci pour votre réponse Nicolas Muntz
Mixbus et Debian 9 : https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?t373 Le forum Mixbus : http://mixbus.harrisonconsoles.com/forum/forum-7-page-4.html Da Vinci Resolve : https://www.linuxuprising.com/2018/06/how-to-install-davinci-resolve-15-in.html Voilà une base pour ta recherche, je ne connais pas.
Le 23/10/2018 à 13:37, nicolas@muntz.fr a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je souhaiterais passer d'Ubuntu à Debian sous peu. Mais avant je
voudrais savoir si Debian peut faire tourner les logiciels de son et
vidéo Mixbus et Da Vinci Resolve?
Merci pour votre réponse
Nicolas Muntz
Mixbus et Debian 9 : https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?t373
Le forum Mixbus :
http://mixbus.harrisonconsoles.com/forum/forum-7-page-4.html
Da Vinci Resolve :
https://www.linuxuprising.com/2018/06/how-to-install-davinci-resolve-15-in.html
Voilà une base pour ta recherche, je ne connais pas.
Bonjour, Je souhaiterais passer d'Ubuntu à Debian sous peu. Mais avant je voudrais savoir si Debian peut faire tourner les logiciels de son et vidéo Mixbus et Da Vinci Resolve? Merci pour votre réponse Nicolas Muntz
Mixbus et Debian 9 : https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?t373 Le forum Mixbus : http://mixbus.harrisonconsoles.com/forum/forum-7-page-4.html Da Vinci Resolve : https://www.linuxuprising.com/2018/06/how-to-install-davinci-resolve-15-in.html Voilà une base pour ta recherche, je ne connais pas.
Bruno Volpi
Salut, pour savoir ce qui est inclus comme package dans DEBIAN : https://packages.debian.org/stable/ Bruno Volpi Le 23/10/2018 à 13:37, a écrit :
Bonjour, Je souhaiterais passer d'Ubuntu à Debian sous peu. Mais avant je voudrais savoir si Debian peut faire tourner les logiciels de son et vidéo Mixbus et Da Vinci Resolve? Merci pour votre réponse Nicolas Muntz
Salut,
pour savoir ce qui est inclus comme package dans DEBIAN :
https://packages.debian.org/stable/
Bruno Volpi
Le 23/10/2018 à 13:37, nicolas@muntz.fr a écrit :
Bonjour,
Je souhaiterais passer d'Ubuntu à Debian sous peu. Mais avant je
voudrais savoir si Debian peut faire tourner les logiciels de son et
vidéo Mixbus et Da Vinci Resolve?
Salut, pour savoir ce qui est inclus comme package dans DEBIAN : https://packages.debian.org/stable/ Bruno Volpi Le 23/10/2018 à 13:37, a écrit :
Bonjour, Je souhaiterais passer d'Ubuntu à Debian sous peu. Mais avant je voudrais savoir si Debian peut faire tourner les logiciels de son et vidéo Mixbus et Da Vinci Resolve? Merci pour votre réponse Nicolas Muntz
Pierre Frenkiel
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463809023-926190998-1540387989=:29707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Wallace wrote:
Je ne connais pas ces logiciels mais je sais que la partie multimedia est très bien gérée par http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
attention, c'est dangereux! voici un extrait de https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ 2.5. There is 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' and 'deb-multimedia.org'. So what's the difference? 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is the team behind the packaging of multimedia related packages distributed with Debian. In other words, 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is us. 'deb-multimedia.org' (aka 'dmo' or 'd-m.o', formerly 'debian-multimedia.org') is a site that offers a repository of multimedia packages as well. That site is maintained by an individual that is not part of this team. 2.5.1. freedom A key difference between the 'deb-multimedia.org' and our team is that we strive to maintain packages that are considered DFSG free or get them to a state where they become DFSG free. Moreover, we aim at proper integration of programs into the Debian system. In contrast to official Debian packages, many packages from 'deb-multimedia.org' are licensed under non-free terms that limit their use and are not freely redistributable. 2.5.2. versioning To distinguish between our official packages and packages from d-m.o, d-m.o adds an 'epoch' to the version number and uses a specific revision counter. This means that once you installed a version from d-m.o, package management software will always consider that version newer than the official package - even when the official package is in actual fact a newer version (but without the epoch). 2.6. Does the team coordinate package maintenance with dmo? No. There is no such coordination with the team and anyone in dmo. There have been attempts to coordinate package maintenance with dmo, but the maintainer of dmo has consistently expressed no interest in coordinating package maintenance with anyone in the team. 2.8. Well, isn't deb-multimedia.org an official part of Debian? This is a common misconception in regards to what deb-multimedia.org is. Although dmo is run by a Debian Developer and used to make use of the word "Debian" and the Debian trademark, dmo is in fact not a part of Debian or affiliated with Debian in any way. The fund-raising that happens there does not go towards Debian. As far as we understand it, dmo is maintained by only two people, neither of whom are a part of this team. Cordialement, -- Pierre Frenkiel ---1463809023-926190998-1540387989=:29707--
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Je ne connais pas ces logiciels mais je sais que la partie multimedia
est très bien gérée par http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
attention, c'est dangereux!
voici un extrait de https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
2.5. There is 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' and 'deb-multimedia.org'. So
what's the difference? 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is the team behind
the packaging of multimedia related packages distributed with Debian. In
other words, 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is us.
'deb-multimedia.org' (aka 'dmo' or 'd-m.o', formerly
'debian-multimedia.org') is a site that offers a repository of multimedia
packages as well. That site is maintained by an individual that is not
part of this team.
2.5.1. freedom A key difference between the 'deb-multimedia.org' and our
team is that we strive to maintain packages that are considered DFSG free
or get them to a state where they become DFSG free. Moreover, we aim at
proper integration of programs into the Debian system. In contrast to
official Debian packages, many packages from 'deb-multimedia.org' are
licensed under non-free terms that limit their use and are not freely
redistributable.
2.5.2. versioning To distinguish between our official packages and packages
from d-m.o, d-m.o adds an 'epoch' to the version number and uses a specific
revision counter. This means that once you installed a version from d-m.o,
package management software will always consider that version newer than
the official package - even when the official package is in actual fact
a newer version (but without the epoch).
2.6. Does the team coordinate package maintenance with dmo? No. There
is no such coordination with the team and anyone in dmo. There have been
attempts to coordinate package maintenance with dmo, but the maintainer
of dmo has consistently expressed no interest in coordinating package
maintenance with anyone in the team.
2.8. Well, isn't deb-multimedia.org an official part of Debian? This is
a common misconception in regards to what deb-multimedia.org is. Although
dmo is run by a Debian Developer and used to make use of the word "Debian"
and the Debian trademark, dmo is in fact not a part of Debian or affiliated
with Debian in any way. The fund-raising that happens there does not go
towards Debian. As far as we understand it, dmo is maintained by only
two people, neither of whom are a part of this team.
Cordialement,
--
Pierre Frenkiel
---1463809023-926190998-1540387989=:29707--
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463809023-926190998-1540387989=:29707 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Wallace wrote:
Je ne connais pas ces logiciels mais je sais que la partie multimedia est très bien gérée par http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
attention, c'est dangereux! voici un extrait de https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ 2.5. There is 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' and 'deb-multimedia.org'. So what's the difference? 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is the team behind the packaging of multimedia related packages distributed with Debian. In other words, 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is us. 'deb-multimedia.org' (aka 'dmo' or 'd-m.o', formerly 'debian-multimedia.org') is a site that offers a repository of multimedia packages as well. That site is maintained by an individual that is not part of this team. 2.5.1. freedom A key difference between the 'deb-multimedia.org' and our team is that we strive to maintain packages that are considered DFSG free or get them to a state where they become DFSG free. Moreover, we aim at proper integration of programs into the Debian system. In contrast to official Debian packages, many packages from 'deb-multimedia.org' are licensed under non-free terms that limit their use and are not freely redistributable. 2.5.2. versioning To distinguish between our official packages and packages from d-m.o, d-m.o adds an 'epoch' to the version number and uses a specific revision counter. This means that once you installed a version from d-m.o, package management software will always consider that version newer than the official package - even when the official package is in actual fact a newer version (but without the epoch). 2.6. Does the team coordinate package maintenance with dmo? No. There is no such coordination with the team and anyone in dmo. There have been attempts to coordinate package maintenance with dmo, but the maintainer of dmo has consistently expressed no interest in coordinating package maintenance with anyone in the team. 2.8. Well, isn't deb-multimedia.org an official part of Debian? This is a common misconception in regards to what deb-multimedia.org is. Although dmo is run by a Debian Developer and used to make use of the word "Debian" and the Debian trademark, dmo is in fact not a part of Debian or affiliated with Debian in any way. The fund-raising that happens there does not go towards Debian. As far as we understand it, dmo is maintained by only two people, neither of whom are a part of this team. Cordialement, -- Pierre Frenkiel ---1463809023-926190998-1540387989=:29707--
Wallace
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rWVevqXuFyuMwXBBV7WHbpgoNI5FBBMla Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lDC82gOuZJepTeFa8wrjZtEi50ru5PyuY"; protected-headers="v1" From: Wallace To: Message-ID: Subject: Re: installation Debian References:
In-Reply-To: --lDC82gOuZJepTeFa8wrjZtEi50ru5PyuY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: fr Intéressant merci du retour. Etonnant car on voit ce dépôt presque partout quand il s'agit d'avoir une version à jour de ffmpeg ou d'un navigateur avec flash. Le 24/10/2018 à 15:33, Pierre Frenkiel a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Wallace wrote:
Je ne connais pas ces logiciels mais je sais que la partie multimedia est très bien gérée par http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
attention, c'est dangereux! voici un extrait de https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ 2.5. There is 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' and 'deb-multimedia.org'. So what's the difference? 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is the tea m behind the packaging of multimedia related packages distributed with Debian. I n other words, 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is us. 'deb-multimedia.org' (aka 'dmo' or 'd-m.o', formerly 'debian-multimedia.org') is a site that offers a repository of multimed ia packages as well. That site is maintained by an individual that is not part of this team. 2.5.1. freedom A key difference between the 'deb-multimedia.org' and ou r team is that we strive to maintain packages that are considered DFSG fr ee or get them to a state where they become DFSG free. Moreover, we aim at proper integration of programs into the Debian system. In contrast to official Debian packages, many packages from 'deb-multimedia.org' are licensed under non-free terms that limit their use and are not freely redistributable. 2.5.2. versioning To distinguish between our official packages and packages from d-m.o, d-m.o adds an 'epoch' to the version number and uses a specific revision counter. This means that once you installed a version from d-m.o, package management software will always consider that version newer tha n the official package - even when the official package is in actual fact a newer version (but without the epoch). 2.6. Does the team coordinate package maintenance with dmo? No. T here is no such coordination with the team and anyone in dmo. There have bee n attempts to coordinate package maintenance with dmo, but the maintainer of dmo has consistently expressed no interest in coordinating package maintenance with anyone in the team. 2.8. Well, isn't deb-multimedia.org an official part of Debian? T his is a common misconception in regards to what deb-multimedia.org is. Althou gh dmo is run by a Debian Developer and used to make use of the word "Debian" and the Debian trademark, dmo is in fact not a part of Debian or affiliated with Debian in any way. The fund-raising that happens there does not go towards Debian. As far as we understand it, dmo is maintained by only two people, neither of whom are a part of this team. Cordialement,
Intéressant merci du retour. Etonnant car on voit ce dépôt presque
partout quand il s'agit d'avoir une version à jour de ffmpeg ou d'un
navigateur avec flash.
Le 24/10/2018 à 15:33, Pierre Frenkiel a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Wallace wrote:
Je ne connais pas ces logiciels mais je sais que la partie multimedia
est très bien gérée par http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
attention, c'est dangereux!
voici un extrait de https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
2.5. There is 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' and
'deb-multimedia.org'. So
what's the difference? 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is the tea m
behind
the packaging of multimedia related packages distributed with Debian. I n
other words, 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is us.
'deb-multimedia.org' (aka 'dmo' or 'd-m.o', formerly
'debian-multimedia.org') is a site that offers a repository of multimed ia
packages as well. That site is maintained by an individual that is not
part of this team.
2.5.1. freedom A key difference between the 'deb-multimedia.org' and ou r
team is that we strive to maintain packages that are considered DFSG fr ee
or get them to a state where they become DFSG free. Moreover, we aim at
proper integration of programs into the Debian system. In contrast to
official Debian packages, many packages from 'deb-multimedia.org' are
licensed under non-free terms that limit their use and are not freely
redistributable.
2.5.2. versioning To distinguish between our official packages and
packages
from d-m.o, d-m.o adds an 'epoch' to the version number and uses a
specific
revision counter. This means that once you installed a version from
d-m.o,
package management software will always consider that version newer tha n
the official package - even when the official package is in actual fact
a newer version (but without the epoch).
2.6. Does the team coordinate package maintenance with dmo? No. T here
is no such coordination with the team and anyone in dmo. There have bee n
attempts to coordinate package maintenance with dmo, but the maintainer
of dmo has consistently expressed no interest in coordinating package
maintenance with anyone in the team.
2.8. Well, isn't deb-multimedia.org an official part of Debian? T his is
a common misconception in regards to what deb-multimedia.org is. Althou gh
dmo is run by a Debian Developer and used to make use of the word
"Debian"
and the Debian trademark, dmo is in fact not a part of Debian or
affiliated
with Debian in any way. The fund-raising that happens there does not go
towards Debian. As far as we understand it, dmo is maintained by only
two people, neither of whom are a part of this team.
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rWVevqXuFyuMwXBBV7WHbpgoNI5FBBMla Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lDC82gOuZJepTeFa8wrjZtEi50ru5PyuY"; protected-headers="v1" From: Wallace To: Message-ID: Subject: Re: installation Debian References:
In-Reply-To: --lDC82gOuZJepTeFa8wrjZtEi50ru5PyuY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: fr Intéressant merci du retour. Etonnant car on voit ce dépôt presque partout quand il s'agit d'avoir une version à jour de ffmpeg ou d'un navigateur avec flash. Le 24/10/2018 à 15:33, Pierre Frenkiel a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Wallace wrote:
Je ne connais pas ces logiciels mais je sais que la partie multimedia est très bien gérée par http://www.deb-multimedia.org/
attention, c'est dangereux! voici un extrait de https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ 2.5. There is 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' and 'deb-multimedia.org'. So what's the difference? 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is the tea m behind the packaging of multimedia related packages distributed with Debian. I n other words, 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is us. 'deb-multimedia.org' (aka 'dmo' or 'd-m.o', formerly 'debian-multimedia.org') is a site that offers a repository of multimed ia packages as well. That site is maintained by an individual that is not part of this team. 2.5.1. freedom A key difference between the 'deb-multimedia.org' and ou r team is that we strive to maintain packages that are considered DFSG fr ee or get them to a state where they become DFSG free. Moreover, we aim at proper integration of programs into the Debian system. In contrast to official Debian packages, many packages from 'deb-multimedia.org' are licensed under non-free terms that limit their use and are not freely redistributable. 2.5.2. versioning To distinguish between our official packages and packages from d-m.o, d-m.o adds an 'epoch' to the version number and uses a specific revision counter. This means that once you installed a version from d-m.o, package management software will always consider that version newer tha n the official package - even when the official package is in actual fact a newer version (but without the epoch). 2.6. Does the team coordinate package maintenance with dmo? No. T here is no such coordination with the team and anyone in dmo. There have bee n attempts to coordinate package maintenance with dmo, but the maintainer of dmo has consistently expressed no interest in coordinating package maintenance with anyone in the team. 2.8. Well, isn't deb-multimedia.org an official part of Debian? T his is a common misconception in regards to what deb-multimedia.org is. Althou gh dmo is run by a Debian Developer and used to make use of the word "Debian" and the Debian trademark, dmo is in fact not a part of Debian or affiliated with Debian in any way. The fund-raising that happens there does not go towards Debian. As far as we understand it, dmo is maintained by only two people, neither of whom are a part of this team. Cordialement,
