[En-tÛte "Followup-To:" positionnÚ Ó fr.rec.photo.numerique.] En ce jour d'automne 27-11-2007, Yvon Travailler prit la plume :
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message de news:fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablement la pire référence sur le net.
Apres toi, si tant est que tu sois une reference. Lui au moins
effectue des test avant de dire quelque chose... Toi, que fais-tu a part donner ton avis sur tout et sur rien, avis sans fondement bien sur.
Fernand Naudin
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" <asdas...@ksdkjsd.cna> wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" <bu.jean-pie...@neuf.fr> a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$1@aioe.org...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la
pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2
These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of
equipment
which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and
many
are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof
4x5s.
These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits,
Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital
SLRs
designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because
they
cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film
cameras used
by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
Fernand Naudin
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" <asdas...@ksdkjsd.cna> wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" <bu.jean-pie...@neuf.fr> a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$1@aioe.org...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la
pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2
These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of
equipment
which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and
many
are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof
4x5s.
These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits,
Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital
SLRs
designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because
they
cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film
cameras used
by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
Fernand Naudin
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" <asdas...@ksdkjsd.cna> wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" <bu.jean-pie...@neuf.fr> a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$1@aioe.org...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la
pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2
These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of
equipment
which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and
many
are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof
4x5s.
These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits,
Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital
SLRs
designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because
they
cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film
cameras used
by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
Fernand Naudin
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
On 27 nov, 20:13, "Yvon Travailler" <asdas...@ksdkjsd.cna> wrote:
"Fernand Naudin" <bu.jean-pie...@neuf.fr> a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$1@aioe.org...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la
pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2
These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of
equipment
which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and
many
are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof
4x5s.
These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits,
Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital
SLRs
designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because
they
cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film
cameras used
by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
"Fernand Naudin" a écrit dans le message denews :fihpvm$q0$
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d300.htm
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablemen t la pire référence sur le net.
Quand on écrit ça, on ne peut pas être foncièrement mauvais :
"Rich Amateur: Level 2 These are amateurs who, by having too much money, buy lots of equipment which can fetter their freedom of expression. They are mostly men, and many are old or retired.
Rich amateurs shoot Leicas, Contaxes, Alpas, Hasselblads and Linhof 4x5s. These are great cameras, but the results are the same as the Zenits, Pentaxes, Bronicas and Tachiharas.
Today they mostly shoot Canon 1Ds-Mk IIs, 5Ds or Nikon D2X.
These are the same idiots who bought the first 2.7 Megapixel digital SLRs designed for newspapers like the Nikon D1 back in 2000 just because they cost $5,000. They gave technically poorer results than the film cameras used by snapshooters. All because it's expensive doesn't make it good. "
Pour la totale (multilingue) :
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/7.htm
avec un néologisme génial : "measurbator"...lol
Vincent Becker
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablement la pire référence sur le net.
en tout cas il doit être daltonien. Le saturation max qu'il vante est une horreur (sans compter que dans le genre argument d'achat, c'est complètement naze).
-- Vincent Becker Photographies et appareils anciens - Photography and classic cameras <URL:http://www.lumieresenboite.com>
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablement la
pire référence sur le net.
en tout cas il doit être daltonien. Le saturation max qu'il vante est
une horreur (sans compter que dans le genre argument d'achat, c'est
complètement naze).
--
Vincent Becker
Photographies et appareils anciens - Photography and classic cameras
<URL:http://www.lumieresenboite.com>
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablement la pire référence sur le net.
en tout cas il doit être daltonien. Le saturation max qu'il vante est une horreur (sans compter que dans le genre argument d'achat, c'est complètement naze).
-- Vincent Becker Photographies et appareils anciens - Photography and classic cameras <URL:http://www.lumieresenboite.com>
Vincent Becker
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablement la pire référence sur le net.
en tout cas il doit être daltonien. Le saturation max qu'il vante est une horreur (sans compter que dans le genre argument d'achat, c'est complètement naze).
-- Vincent Becker Photographies et appareils anciens - Photography and classic cameras <URL:http://www.lumieresenboite.com>
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablement la
pire référence sur le net.
en tout cas il doit être daltonien. Le saturation max qu'il vante est
une horreur (sans compter que dans le genre argument d'achat, c'est
complètement naze).
--
Vincent Becker
Photographies et appareils anciens - Photography and classic cameras
<URL:http://www.lumieresenboite.com>
Le D300 est une caméra exceptionnelle, mais Ken Rockwell est probablement la pire référence sur le net.
en tout cas il doit être daltonien. Le saturation max qu'il vante est une horreur (sans compter que dans le genre argument d'achat, c'est complètement naze).
-- Vincent Becker Photographies et appareils anciens - Photography and classic cameras <URL:http://www.lumieresenboite.com>
