Bonjour
existe-t-il un logiciel gratuit (open source de préférence) pour creer
un site sous XP ?
je connaissais NVU mais il était bien limité
http://frenchmozilla.sourceforge.net/nvu/
merci d'avance
A+
Lancelot
[supprimer leurre pour me répondre]
Bonjour existe-t-il un logiciel gratuit (open source de préférence) pour creer un site sous XP ? je connaissais NVU mais il était bien limité http://frenchmozilla.sourceforge.net/nvu/
merci d'avance A+ Lancelot [supprimer leurre pour me répondre]
Bonjour, je trouve qu'on parle peu des CMS (système de gestion de contenu) cela semble être une alternative interressante même si je n'en cerne pas encore bien tout le principe... voici ceux que j'ai "sélectionnés" il y a qq temps mais pas encore testé car j'ai saturé après toutes ces recherches ! : http://www.cmsimple.fr/ http://www.cmsmadesimple.fr/ http://drupalfr.org/ http://www.typo3.fr/ (l'un d'eux est payant il me semble) (il y a aussi les poids lourds comme Joomla, Xoops ou Spip plus accès multi-utilisateurs et bcp de fonctions, je ne les ai pas retenu pour mon besoin plus basique)
On peut aussi greffer un editeur en ligne et gratuit, (wysiwyg pour ma préférence car je ne sais pas coder), comme semble t-il les 2 leader : http://www.fckeditor.net/ http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/
J'espère ne pas être HS par rapport à la question, car ici il est peu question de "code" même si l'aspect codage n'a surtout été mis en avant que dans les réponses. Ces liens sont le fruit de mes longues recherche pour trouver un CMS, ou toute autre solution pour éditer (ou créer) facilement un site, comme j'ai dit tout ça est encore flou pour moi mais je pense avoir fait une bonne sélection d'après tous les avis et descriptifs lu. Si quelqu'un pouvais m'aider un peu, en fait mon but serait de continuer à créer avec DW auquel je suis habitué (aspect graphique et je code très mal!) et installer l'une de ces solutions ci dessus pour la personne pour qui j'aurai réalisé le site, afin qu'elle le modifie à sa guise. Mais je ne sais pas si je peux d'une manière ou d'une autre "greffer" ça avec DW...dite moi si je suis sur la bonne voie :-)
"Lancelot" <leurrero.nald@laposte.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
478bba7a.183085432@news.free.fr
Bonjour
existe-t-il un logiciel gratuit (open source de préférence) pour creer
un site sous XP ?
je connaissais NVU mais il était bien limité
http://frenchmozilla.sourceforge.net/nvu/
merci d'avance
A+
Lancelot
[supprimer leurre pour me répondre]
Bonjour, je trouve qu'on parle peu des CMS (système de gestion de contenu)
cela semble être une alternative interressante même si je n'en cerne pas
encore bien tout le principe... voici ceux que j'ai "sélectionnés" il y a qq
temps mais pas encore testé car j'ai saturé après toutes ces recherches ! :
http://www.cmsimple.fr/
http://www.cmsmadesimple.fr/
http://drupalfr.org/
http://www.typo3.fr/
(l'un d'eux est payant il me semble)
(il y a aussi les poids lourds comme Joomla, Xoops ou Spip plus accès
multi-utilisateurs et bcp de fonctions, je ne les ai pas retenu pour mon
besoin plus basique)
On peut aussi greffer un editeur en ligne et gratuit, (wysiwyg pour ma
préférence car je ne sais pas coder), comme semble t-il les 2 leader :
http://www.fckeditor.net/
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/
J'espère ne pas être HS par rapport à la question, car ici il est peu
question de "code" même si l'aspect codage n'a surtout été mis en avant que
dans les réponses. Ces liens sont le fruit de mes longues recherche pour
trouver un CMS, ou toute autre solution pour éditer (ou créer) facilement un
site, comme j'ai dit tout ça est encore flou pour moi mais je pense avoir
fait une bonne sélection d'après tous les avis et descriptifs lu.
Si quelqu'un pouvais m'aider un peu, en fait mon but serait de continuer à
créer avec DW auquel je suis habitué (aspect graphique et je code très mal!)
et installer l'une de ces solutions ci dessus pour la personne pour qui
j'aurai réalisé le site, afin qu'elle le modifie à sa guise. Mais je ne sais
pas si je peux d'une manière ou d'une autre "greffer" ça avec DW...dite moi
si je suis sur la bonne voie :-)
Bonjour existe-t-il un logiciel gratuit (open source de préférence) pour creer un site sous XP ? je connaissais NVU mais il était bien limité http://frenchmozilla.sourceforge.net/nvu/
merci d'avance A+ Lancelot [supprimer leurre pour me répondre]
Bonjour, je trouve qu'on parle peu des CMS (système de gestion de contenu) cela semble être une alternative interressante même si je n'en cerne pas encore bien tout le principe... voici ceux que j'ai "sélectionnés" il y a qq temps mais pas encore testé car j'ai saturé après toutes ces recherches ! : http://www.cmsimple.fr/ http://www.cmsmadesimple.fr/ http://drupalfr.org/ http://www.typo3.fr/ (l'un d'eux est payant il me semble) (il y a aussi les poids lourds comme Joomla, Xoops ou Spip plus accès multi-utilisateurs et bcp de fonctions, je ne les ai pas retenu pour mon besoin plus basique)
On peut aussi greffer un editeur en ligne et gratuit, (wysiwyg pour ma préférence car je ne sais pas coder), comme semble t-il les 2 leader : http://www.fckeditor.net/ http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/
J'espère ne pas être HS par rapport à la question, car ici il est peu question de "code" même si l'aspect codage n'a surtout été mis en avant que dans les réponses. Ces liens sont le fruit de mes longues recherche pour trouver un CMS, ou toute autre solution pour éditer (ou créer) facilement un site, comme j'ai dit tout ça est encore flou pour moi mais je pense avoir fait une bonne sélection d'après tous les avis et descriptifs lu. Si quelqu'un pouvais m'aider un peu, en fait mon but serait de continuer à créer avec DW auquel je suis habitué (aspect graphique et je code très mal!) et installer l'une de ces solutions ci dessus pour la personne pour qui j'aurai réalisé le site, afin qu'elle le modifie à sa guise. Mais je ne sais pas si je peux d'une manière ou d'une autre "greffer" ça avec DW...dite moi si je suis sur la bonne voie :-)
Le Gaulois
Antoine a écrit :
vim et emacs n'ont pas seulement pour eux d'être puissants mais ce sont les seuls vrais éditeurs opensource *et* multiplateformes à avoir une pérennité à peu près assurée.
Pour la pérénité, c'est sûr. J'ai appris vi il y a 20 ans, je ne suis pas dépaysé par le vim actuel. Je l'ai utilisé sous 6 unix différents (sans compter les différentes distributions Linux) sous MS-DOS et Windows en ligne de commande.
Comme Sergio, je n'ai jamais pu me faire à emacs
+1
Antoine a écrit :
vim et emacs n'ont pas seulement pour eux d'être puissants mais ce
sont les seuls vrais éditeurs opensource *et* multiplateformes à
avoir une pérennité à peu près assurée.
Pour la pérénité, c'est sûr. J'ai appris vi il y a 20 ans, je ne
suis pas dépaysé par le vim actuel. Je l'ai utilisé sous 6 unix
différents (sans compter les différentes distributions Linux)
sous MS-DOS et Windows en ligne de commande.
vim et emacs n'ont pas seulement pour eux d'être puissants mais ce sont les seuls vrais éditeurs opensource *et* multiplateformes à avoir une pérennité à peu près assurée.
Pour la pérénité, c'est sûr. J'ai appris vi il y a 20 ans, je ne suis pas dépaysé par le vim actuel. Je l'ai utilisé sous 6 unix différents (sans compter les différentes distributions Linux) sous MS-DOS et Windows en ligne de commande.
Comme Sergio, je n'ai jamais pu me faire à emacs
+1
prac
Bonsoir
Gratuit, sans publicité, 500 Mio espace de stockage, un editeur :
Google Page Creator
ici http://pages.google.com
bonne soirée
--- http://philippe.chappuis.googlepages.com ---
Bonsoir
Gratuit, sans publicité, 500 Mio espace de stockage, un editeur :
Gratuit, sans publicité, 500 Mio espace de stockage, un editeur :
Google Page Creator
ici http://pages.google.com
bonne soirée
--- http://philippe.chappuis.googlepages.com ---
Sergio
six years previous, signed a note for $300 each, of which every cent had been received and taken back to China by the person who had disposed of them. During the six years they had been the property of two or three successive owners, and when I found them in Penang they were still being detained with the original promissory note hanging over them, though the sum had been paid over and over again. On my insisting on accounts being produced by the brothel-keeper, I discovered that for three years the girls had been earning from 20 to 30 dollars each per month, all of which went to the master, who was surprised when the girls were released and himself threatened with the law." (!)
From this we discover that Mr. Pickering intends that we shall think that the reason why he has a salary from the British Government, is, among other things, to see that slave girls only need to redeem themselves by hard earned money through unspeakable humiliation from one, or two, or more owners, and then there is an end to the patience of the "Protector" with the slave-trader, who will be surprised to find himself "threatened"--not punished--with the law! But Cecil C. Smith, formerly Protector of Chinese (Registrar General) at Hong Kong, was knighted and made Governor at Singapore, and about a year later than this, says, in reference to this very representation: "The Protector of Chinese has no efficient means of dealing with the accounts of the inmates of brothels, nor has he ever dealt with them. The Government should hold itself entirely aloof from interfering with such matters." We see, then, of how much account the representations of Mr. Pickering were as to the usefulness of the "Protector" to the women at this point, but incidentally he has revealed a shocking state of slavery perfectly known and not in the least interfered with by the "Protector."
six
years previous, signed a note for $300 each, of which every cent
had been received and taken back to China by the person who had
disposed of them. During the six years they had been the property
of two or three successive owners, and when I found them in Penang
they were still being detained with the original promissory note
hanging over them, though the sum had been paid over and over
again. On my insisting on accounts being produced by the
brothel-keeper, I discovered that for three years the girls had
been earning from 20 to 30 dollars each per month, all of which
went to the master, who was surprised when the girls were released
and himself threatened with the law." (!)
From this we discover that Mr. Pickering intends that we shall think
that the reason why he has a salary from the British Government,
is, among other things, to see that slave girls only need to redeem
themselves by hard earned money through unspeakable humiliation from
one, or two, or more owners, and then there is an end to the patience
of the "Protector" with the slave-trader, who will be surprised to
find himself "threatened"--not punished--with the law! But Cecil C.
Smith, formerly Protector of Chinese (Registrar General) at Hong Kong,
was knighted and made Governor at Singapore, and about a year later
than this, says, in reference to this very representation: "The
Protector of Chinese has no efficient means of dealing with the
accounts of the inmates of brothels, nor has he ever dealt with them.
The Government should hold itself entirely aloof from interfering with
such matters." We see, then, of how much account the representations
of Mr. Pickering were as to the usefulness of the "Protector" to the
women at this point, but incidentally he has revealed a shocking state
of slavery perfectly known and not in the least interfered with by the
"Protector."
six years previous, signed a note for $300 each, of which every cent had been received and taken back to China by the person who had disposed of them. During the six years they had been the property of two or three successive owners, and when I found them in Penang they were still being detained with the original promissory note hanging over them, though the sum had been paid over and over again. On my insisting on accounts being produced by the brothel-keeper, I discovered that for three years the girls had been earning from 20 to 30 dollars each per month, all of which went to the master, who was surprised when the girls were released and himself threatened with the law." (!)
From this we discover that Mr. Pickering intends that we shall think that the reason why he has a salary from the British Government, is, among other things, to see that slave girls only need to redeem themselves by hard earned money through unspeakable humiliation from one, or two, or more owners, and then there is an end to the patience of the "Protector" with the slave-trader, who will be surprised to find himself "threatened"--not punished--with the law! But Cecil C. Smith, formerly Protector of Chinese (Registrar General) at Hong Kong, was knighted and made Governor at Singapore, and about a year later than this, says, in reference to this very representation: "The Protector of Chinese has no efficient means of dealing with the accounts of the inmates of brothels, nor has he ever dealt with them. The Government should hold itself entirely aloof from interfering with such matters." We see, then, of how much account the representations of Mr. Pickering were as to the usefulness of the "Protector" to the women at this point, but incidentally he has revealed a shocking state of slavery perfectly known and not in the least interfered with by the "Protector."
Paul Gaborit
and all the way through Sir John Pope Hennessy, with one or two notable exceptions, so far as the records go, was shown but scant sympathy in his efforts to correct these abuses.
On April 2nd, 1878, Sir Harcourt Johnstone asked in the House of Commons the Secretary of State for the Colonies, "whether his attention has been directed to a recent outrage committed ... at Hong Kong, which is now forming the subject of inquiry by a Commission appointed by the Governor. And if he will cause special investigation to be made as to the manner in which the revenue derived from licensing houses of ill-fame is raised and expended for the service of the Colony."
In answer to this question, the Commission reported that, "the monies raised both by the licenses from houses of ill-fame, and from the fines inflicted under the provisions of these Ordinances, have been expended in the general services of the Colony; and that the actual revenue derived from this source, since and including 1857 down to the end of 1877, amounted to $187,508, to which must be added the Admiralty allowance from 1870 to 1877, amounting to $28,860, and fines estimated at $5,000, making a total of $221,368.00."
After July 1st, 1878, the fund derived from brothels was used for the operation of the provisions of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance only.
Later, on July 28, 1882, Governor Hennessy received in London a large deputation of gentlemen interested in the abolition of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance of Hong Kong. To these he addressed the following words descriptive of the condition of things at Hong Kong unearthed by the Commission:
"I saw in the Colony abuses existing which have effect far beyond the range of Hong Kong. Let me instance one or two only. We get from Great Britain some European police. They are men selected with care for good conduct, and they are sometimes married men; their passages and their wives' passages have been paid to Hong Kong, where married police qua
and all the way through Sir John Pope
Hennessy, with one or two notable exceptions, so far as the records
go, was shown but scant sympathy in his efforts to correct these
abuses.
On April 2nd, 1878, Sir Harcourt Johnstone asked in the House of
Commons the Secretary of State for the Colonies, "whether his
attention has been directed to a recent outrage committed ... at Hong
Kong, which is now forming the subject of inquiry by a Commission
appointed by the Governor. And if he will cause special investigation
to be made as to the manner in which the revenue derived from
licensing houses of ill-fame is raised and expended for the service of
the Colony."
In answer to this question, the Commission reported that, "the monies
raised both by the licenses from houses of ill-fame, and from the
fines inflicted under the provisions of these Ordinances, have been
expended in the general services of the Colony; and that the actual
revenue derived from this source, since and including 1857 down to
the end of 1877, amounted to $187,508, to which must be added the
Admiralty allowance from 1870 to 1877, amounting to $28,860, and fines
estimated at $5,000, making a total of $221,368.00."
After July 1st, 1878, the fund derived from brothels was used for the
operation of the provisions of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance only.
Later, on July 28, 1882, Governor Hennessy received in London a large
deputation of gentlemen interested in the abolition of the Contagious
Diseases Ordinance of Hong Kong. To these he addressed the following
words descriptive of the condition of things at Hong Kong unearthed by
the Commission:
"I saw in the Colony abuses existing which have effect far beyond
the range of Hong Kong. Let me instance one or two only. We get
from Great Britain some European police. They are men selected
with care for good conduct, and they are sometimes married men;
their passages and their wives' passages have been paid to Hong
Kong, where married police qua
and all the way through Sir John Pope Hennessy, with one or two notable exceptions, so far as the records go, was shown but scant sympathy in his efforts to correct these abuses.
On April 2nd, 1878, Sir Harcourt Johnstone asked in the House of Commons the Secretary of State for the Colonies, "whether his attention has been directed to a recent outrage committed ... at Hong Kong, which is now forming the subject of inquiry by a Commission appointed by the Governor. And if he will cause special investigation to be made as to the manner in which the revenue derived from licensing houses of ill-fame is raised and expended for the service of the Colony."
In answer to this question, the Commission reported that, "the monies raised both by the licenses from houses of ill-fame, and from the fines inflicted under the provisions of these Ordinances, have been expended in the general services of the Colony; and that the actual revenue derived from this source, since and including 1857 down to the end of 1877, amounted to $187,508, to which must be added the Admiralty allowance from 1870 to 1877, amounting to $28,860, and fines estimated at $5,000, making a total of $221,368.00."
After July 1st, 1878, the fund derived from brothels was used for the operation of the provisions of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance only.
Later, on July 28, 1882, Governor Hennessy received in London a large deputation of gentlemen interested in the abolition of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance of Hong Kong. To these he addressed the following words descriptive of the condition of things at Hong Kong unearthed by the Commission:
"I saw in the Colony abuses existing which have effect far beyond the range of Hong Kong. Let me instance one or two only. We get from Great Britain some European police. They are men selected with care for good conduct, and they are sometimes married men; their passages and their wives' passages have been paid to Hong Kong, where married police qua
Alain Naigeon
in purer or cleaner language than that used in the quotations from official statements and letters, but the language might be more suited to public taste. But worth cannot be sacrificed to taste, and, as we have said, we feel compelled to publish the matter in its present form first of all.
We send it forth, therefore, with the earnest prayer that, while the book itself may have a limited circulation, yet, through the providence of God, it may arouse some one to attempt that which seems beyond our powers and opportunity,--some one who will feel the call of God; who has the training and the ability; some one who has the spirit of devotion and self-denial; some one of keen moral perceptions and lofty faith in the ultimate triumph of justice, who will lead a crusade that will never halt until Oriental slavery is banished from our land, and it can no more be said, "The name of God is blasphemed among the heathen because of you."
The documents from which we have quoted so extensively in this book are the following:
"_Correspondence Relating to the Working of the Contagious Diseases Ordinances of the Colony of Hongkong_." August 1881. C.-3093.
"_Copy of Report of the Commissioners Appointed by His Excellency, John Pope Hennessy ... to inquire Into the Working of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance, 1867_." March 11, 1880. H.C. 118.
"_Correspondence Respecting the Alleged Existence of Chinese Slavery in Hongkong_." March, 1882. C.-3185.
"_Return of all the British Colonies and Dependencies in Which by Ordinance or Otherwise Any System Involving the Principles of the Late Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 and 1869, is in force, with Copies of Such Ordinances or Other Regulations_." June, 1886. H.C. 247.
"_Copies of Correspondence or Extracts Therefrom Relating to the Repeal of Contagious Diseases Ordinances and Regulations in the Crown Colonies_." September, 1887. H.C.
in
purer or cleaner language than that used in the quotations from
official statements and letters, but the language might be more suited
to public taste. But worth cannot be sacrificed to taste, and, as we
have said, we feel compelled to publish the matter in its present form
first of all.
We send it forth, therefore, with the earnest prayer that, while
the book itself may have a limited circulation, yet, through the
providence of God, it may arouse some one to attempt that which seems
beyond our powers and opportunity,--some one who will feel the call of
God; who has the training and the ability; some one who has the spirit
of devotion and self-denial; some one of keen moral perceptions and
lofty faith in the ultimate triumph of justice, who will lead a
crusade that will never halt until Oriental slavery is banished from
our land, and it can no more be said, "The name of God is blasphemed
among the heathen because of you."
The documents from which we have quoted so extensively in this book
are the following:
"_Correspondence Relating to the Working of the Contagious Diseases
Ordinances of the Colony of Hongkong_." August 1881. C.-3093.
"_Copy of Report of the Commissioners Appointed by His Excellency,
John Pope Hennessy ... to inquire Into the Working of the Contagious
Diseases Ordinance, 1867_." March 11, 1880. H.C. 118.
"_Correspondence Respecting the Alleged Existence of Chinese Slavery
in Hongkong_." March, 1882. C.-3185.
"_Return of all the British Colonies and Dependencies in Which by
Ordinance or Otherwise Any System Involving the Principles of the Late
Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 and 1869, is in force, with Copies of
Such Ordinances or Other Regulations_." June, 1886. H.C. 247.
"_Copies of Correspondence or Extracts Therefrom Relating to the
Repeal of Contagious Diseases Ordinances and Regulations in the Crown
Colonies_." September, 1887. H.C.
in purer or cleaner language than that used in the quotations from official statements and letters, but the language might be more suited to public taste. But worth cannot be sacrificed to taste, and, as we have said, we feel compelled to publish the matter in its present form first of all.
We send it forth, therefore, with the earnest prayer that, while the book itself may have a limited circulation, yet, through the providence of God, it may arouse some one to attempt that which seems beyond our powers and opportunity,--some one who will feel the call of God; who has the training and the ability; some one who has the spirit of devotion and self-denial; some one of keen moral perceptions and lofty faith in the ultimate triumph of justice, who will lead a crusade that will never halt until Oriental slavery is banished from our land, and it can no more be said, "The name of God is blasphemed among the heathen because of you."
The documents from which we have quoted so extensively in this book are the following:
"_Correspondence Relating to the Working of the Contagious Diseases Ordinances of the Colony of Hongkong_." August 1881. C.-3093.
"_Copy of Report of the Commissioners Appointed by His Excellency, John Pope Hennessy ... to inquire Into the Working of the Contagious Diseases Ordinance, 1867_." March 11, 1880. H.C. 118.
"_Correspondence Respecting the Alleged Existence of Chinese Slavery in Hongkong_." March, 1882. C.-3185.
"_Return of all the British Colonies and Dependencies in Which by Ordinance or Otherwise Any System Involving the Principles of the Late Contagious Diseases Acts, 1866 and 1869, is in force, with Copies of Such Ordinances or Other Regulations_." June, 1886. H.C. 247.
"_Copies of Correspondence or Extracts Therefrom Relating to the Repeal of Contagious Diseases Ordinances and Regulations in the Crown Colonies_." September, 1887. H.C.
